The OM-D E-M10 was my first mirrorless camera. I purchased the E-M10 in May 2014 and I still remember the giddiness I had when I pressed the shutter the first time.

Olympus one-upped the E-M10 earlier this morning with their announcement of the OM-D E-M10 Mark II. To me, it looks like the original E-M10 with a better electronic viewfinder, an all-metal build, 5-axis stabilization, and a rearranging of some dials. They also changed the dimensions of the E-M10 Mark II in every direction by a millimeter or two, making the current E-M10 ECG-1 grip obsolete.

These are all good things for the most part, since the original E-M10 was an incredible camera considering its retail price. The original E-M10 was so good, in fact, that my pal Álvaro thinks it was too good. It’s hard to argue his reasoning: The original E-M10 had improvements in almost every category over the OM-D E-M5 and, considering its price, was a far better purchase option than the E-M5.

But now, with the plethora of improvements to the OM-D E-M5 Mark II earlier this year, the E-M10 Mark II doesn’t surpass its bigger brother. The E-M10 Mark II feels much more like an iterative update than the expansive update of the E-M5 Mark II. And as such, I don’t blame anyone for feeling let down by today’s announcement. The E-M10 Mark II looks like a great camera, but not one which will incite current E-M10 owners to upgrade.

Even as a first purchase, I’m left wondering if the original E-M10 — at a now-reduced price — is a better buy. For an extra $250 USD, you get a better electronic viewfinder, a better build, and a better stabilization system in the Mark II. Or, if you haven’t been spoiled by an excellent viewfinder — like the one found in the E-M5 Mark II — and you don’t need an all-metal (non-weather sealed) build, I say save the cash and put it towards the Panasonic Lumix 20mm pancake lens. I still think the original E-M10 and the Lumix pancake lens are a fantastic buy.

As always, brew your favourite cup of coffee and enjoy these fine reads this Sunday morning. I think you’re in for a treat.

I’ve added a small addendum to this week’s Edition about my first chances to shoot with the Panasonic Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2.

Happy Sunday.

Fantastic Reads

No One Walks Off The Island — This piece about Yasiel Puig defecting from Cuba to play in the Big Leagues is one from Hollywood. The treason. The espionage. The murders. This stuff only happens in the movies.

This piece won awards last year for its incredible in-depth reporting and investigation, so you may have already seen it. Regardless, this could be my single favourite piece of investigative sports journalism ever.

Preparing For Life After Sports — On Maurice Clarett in an interview by ESPN:

It was a lesson he’d learned after failing to take advantage of the educational opportunities he might have had and sabotaging his football career by fighting with his coaches, among other missteps. Eventually he went to prison for armed robbery. Now he’s advising young male athletes to do as he says, rather than as he did.

Umpires Are Less Blind Than They Used To Be — If the level of scrutiny, technology, and statistics put on the backs of umpires were applied to officials of all sports, I believe the results would be similar: Referees make the correct call far more than any fan would like to believe, and their ability to adapt to the changing styles of their sport would be on the rise. Nobody is perfect in the officiating industry, but they are far closer to perfect than anyone would guess.

How Relay FM Proves That Podcasts Aren’t An Overnight Success — I love when great things happen to great people. It ensures the hope we all have: That work, dedication, and perseverance can — and often do — result in success.

Photography

Flying High Photographer Captures Bird’s-eye Beach Views by Hanging From Helicopter — If I could choose a super hero power, I’d choose to fly. I’d also choose to fly at great speeds and great distances so I could leave the airport behind. But I may be pushing my luck on that one.

Sony a7R II Hands-On Review — Kai likes it. As does everyone else.

More shallow depth of field with your Micro Four Thirds camera – Using the Brenizer Method — Interesting method to obtain shallow depth of field with wide angles. This looks like tons of work and tons of know-how in Lightroom.

I say buy the Leica Nocticron and skip the Lightroom part. As you’ll see, it’s not a perfect science, nor is it the exact same look, but I think the images from the Nocticron and images with the Brenizer Method look largely the same.

First contact: a walk around Plasencia with the Sony A7 Mark II — Álvaro’s new camera is probably as exciting for his audience as it is for him. Not only is he going to review the heck out of Sony’s cameras, he’s also going to shoot beautiful Spanish countrysides and cityscapes in the process.

Money

10 Insanely Rich Pro Athletes Humbled by Financial Ruin — These athletes would be great choices for those old Capital One MasterCard “Hands In My Pockets” commercials. The shoe fits, and they could probably use the money.

Disney’s $4 Billion Steal — M.G. Siegler:

Based on nothing other than internet reaction, pent-up demand, and the fact that this new Star Wars cannot possibly be as bad as the last three, I’m going to go not-so-far out on a limb and predict that The Force Awakens makes over $2 billion worldwide at the box office. […] And if it does, that means that Disney will have brought in half of its $4 billion investment in just one film.

My lens spending spree reached its pinnacle two or three weeks ago with the purchase of the Panasonic Leica DG Nocticron 42.5mm f/1.2. Once again, I found a good deal on eBay.

This purchase is more of a trial run than it is a final decision. Canada doesn’t have any Micro Four Thirds lens renters that I’m aware of, so my next best options are to rent the lens Stateside and not declare my possession of the lens at the border, or to outright purchase the lens at the best deal I can find and resell it afterwards. Luckily, the Nocticron appears to hold its value pretty well, so I suspect this will end up costing largely the same amount as a long-term rental.

And hey, if I want to keep it, I’ll just sell the Olympus 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO.¹ Perfect.

On to the lens.

My initial impressions are as good as I expected, but I have stumbled upon a few annoyances with the Nocticron that I haven’t experienced with other lenses.

Without a doubt, the Nocticron’s image quality is second to none on the Micro Four Thirds format. As everyone else on the internet has said, the Nocticron is very sharp right at f/1.2 and its bokeh rendering is so, so smooth. Most impressively, in my mind, is the lens’ ability to soak in light when the sun goes down. Pair the Nocticron’s f/1.2 aperture and the E-M5 Mark II’s incredible in-body stabilization and you’ve got a tool capable of taking extraordinary night shots.

The shot of the spinning “Round Up” ride at the local Corn & Apple Festival above was taken handheld at 1/6 of a second, yet the figures in the foreground are perfectly sharp. Brilliant.

It’s not all roses with the Nocticron though.

First off, the Nocticron’s incredible build quality results in a very heavy, very dense package. If you have this lens strapped to your hip with a shoulder strap, you’re going to notice it with each stride.

Secondly, the width of the lens causes small problems on my E-M5 Mark II body. With the E-M5 Mark II grip attached, there’s enough room to properly hold the grip if you have skinnier hands. However, I’m not 100% sure if a set of larger, beefier hands could squeeze their fingers between the lens body and the grip.

Further, the front function button on the E-M5 Mark II ends up being positioned in the angled crevice between the Nocticron and the camera body. I have this function button set to magnify an area in the viewfinder when using manual focus, and due to the lens’ overall girth, pressing that button — although not impossible — is far more difficult than I’d like. I suppose this is what happens when you use a Panasonic lens on an Olympus body.

And lastly, it goes without being said that the aperture ring doesn’t work on an Olympus camera body. This bugs me. I mean, why not? It’s a gimmick at best and an outright insult at worst. Olympus and Panasonic should be working together to further the Micro 4/3 format instead of whatever it is they are doing now.

With the acquisition of the Nocticron, my Panasonic Leica collection is complete.² I’m curious to see if all my needs will be met with this trifecta.

What has become very obvious is the need for an update to the 25mm f/1.4. Clearly, one of the lenses in the above image doesn’t fit. The 25mm is the only Panasonic Leica lens with a plastic body and without an aperture ring. Further, it suffers from far higher levels of chromatic aberration and is the softest of the three lenses when shot wide open. If Panasonic were to give the 25mm f/1.4 a refresh, I’d hop on board immediately.

Now that this collection is complete, I’ve got some work to do. I’m looking forward to putting these lenses to the test and getting my thoughts on paper.

Any interest? The lens is in top notch condition, with the only blemish being a small mark on the lens hood.Get in touch with any pricing inquiries or if you have any interest. ↩

I’m not including the 45mm f/2.8 Macro-Elmarit. This lens appears to be an afterthought and isn’t on my radar in the slightest. ↩